LOGIN / SIGN UP

#221 PekWM package for Fedora

Reported by: german Assigned to: pekdon
Phase: release-0.1.1 Component:
Type: enhancement Status: closed
Priority: 3: Medium
Watchers:

Attachments

Description

Hello!

This is the first time I use this site. I don't know if I'm posting in the right place.

I'm a proud user of pekwm ;-) and now I've packaged it for Fedora.

The rpm file can be downloaded from here:

http://sites.google.com/site/gracca/fedora

Fedora users, enjoy pekwm!

Thank you very much!

Germán.

2010-03-29

05:38:16 attached 0001-Merge-spec-file-updates-from-german-ref-221.patch
05:38:16

Attached patch with the updates. I'm however a bit uncertain if it is wise to have noreplace on the configuration files as it can have negative impact on functionality not updating them between releases.

Also sent the patch to io-error for pushing.

04:57:50

Hi all:

There is a new release of my RPM package of PekWM. It will be better to include this new spec file to the next release of PekWM (0.1.12):

http://sites.google.com/site/gracca/pekwm.spec

Also, I've submitted the RPM package of PekWM to be in the official repositories of Fedora. I'm waiting to be accepted as a Fedora packager, so my first package would be PekWM:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576685

The new RPM packages are here:

http://sites.google.com/site/gracca/fedora

Cheers, Germán.

2010-02-19

18:13:36

Added the .spec file to the distribution, closing.

18:13:35 changed from new to closed
18:13:35 changed from Andreas to Claes Nästén

2010-01-15

04:51:51

Hi all:

No problems to include the spec file. It can be downloaded from here:

http://sites.google.com/site/gracca/home/pekwm.spec

I've built RPM packages of PekWM for Fedora i686 and x86_64, and they can be found here:

http://sites.google.com/site/gracca/fedora

Cheers, Germán.

2010-01-03

22:22:49

IMHO we can add the spec file to the repository if Germán is okay with it.

17:59:15 changed from Claes Nästén to Andreas
17:59:15

Do you want the spec file to be included or should we just add a link to the package on the Wiki?